Crime coverage limits should be sufficient to cover the potential loss of money and/or securities due to the actions of employees or third parties.
READIt is important to have enough coverage for the unexpected. Read about how to assess your district’s limits and determine if an increase is right for you.
READDenver City Council passed a new bill to curb catalytic converter theft, requiring scrap-yards to send specific information to the city about the seller.
READIf you missed your chance to see Michael at the 2019 SDA Conference, you will get a second chance on May 12th. Discover the details within.
READRead about our members that are focused on preventing cyber security intrusions rather than scrambling to recover from them.
READFind out about the Pool’s history with these types of claims. Discover our best advice to members moving forward and ways that you can evaluate and remedy the risk where you work.
READApproximately 76% of districts that purchase Crime coverage only buy the minimum. While $5,000 may seem sufficient, you don’t need a lot of imagination to think of a scenario in which you’d find yourself grossly underinsured.
READIf you pay attention to the issue of cyber security and data breaches, you’ll surely hear about a slew of malicious attacks from sophisticated hacking organizations and complex high-tech espionage. Recently, the chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary Jo White, even went so far as to say that cyber attacks are the “biggest risk we face” as a nation.
READRecently, two well-publicized cases of employee embezzlement and dishonesty of public workers in Colorado have put the spotlight on special districts. In one instance, an employee was implicated in the embezzlement of over a million dollars, and in another, a former fire chief was charged with the theft of over half a million dollars in […]
READRecently, a friend of mine got a phone call from his bank to alert him that they were freezing his account. The representative described to him a series of suspicious transactions which were indeed purchases he had not authorized. It turned out to be a scam, and if he had fallen for the ruse, he would have given up personal details allowing unscrupulous people to raid his account.
READ